Ethiopia: Internal Developments and External Influences from 1941 to 1991 : Detailed Notes & Exam Questions | Grade 12 History Unit 6

Ethiopia: Internal Developments and External Influences from 1941 to 1991 : Detailed Notes & Exam Questions | Grade 12 History Unit 6

Welcome, dear student! In this unit, we study fifty years of Ethiopian history — from the restoration of Emperor Haile Selassie in \(1941\) to the fall of the Derg regime in \(1991\). This was a period of enormous change: restoration, reform, revolution, military rule, and ultimately another revolution. Understanding this period helps us understand the Ethiopia we live in today. Let us go step by step.

6.1 The Restoration of the Imperial Rule and External Influences

6.1.1 Liberation and Restoration (1941)

As we learned in previous units, Italy had occupied Ethiopia in \(1936\). During the five years of occupation, Ethiopians resisted through patriotic resistance — guerrilla warfare conducted by groups known as “arbegnoch” (patriots) in various parts of the country. Leaders like Ras Imru Haile Selassie, Ras Abebe Aregai, and others coordinated resistance from bases in Gojjam, Shewa, and other regions.

In \(1941\), with the outbreak of World War II and British involvement in East Africa, the opportunity came to expel the Italians. A combined force of Ethiopian patriots and British troops (including African colonial soldiers from Sudan, Kenya, and elsewhere) pushed the Italians out. Emperor Haile Selassie returned to Ethiopia and entered Addis Ababa on May 5, 1941, restoring imperial rule after five years of exile.

Think about this: Why was May 5 chosen as a national holiday? It symbolizes not just the return of an emperor, but the restoration of Ethiopian sovereignty after foreign occupation — a powerful national symbol.

6.1.2 British Influence and the Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement (1942)

Beyond simply helping to liberate Ethiopia, Britain had its own interests in the region. In \(1942\), Ethiopia and Britain signed the Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement, which reflected the significant British influence over Ethiopian affairs during this period.

Key provisions of the agreement:

  • Ethiopia was required to follow British advice on foreign affairs and defense matters.
  • A British military mission was stationed in Ethiopia to advise and train Ethiopian forces.
  • Ethiopia granted Britain certain economic concessions, including control over the railway and telegraph lines.
  • The British-administered Ogaden and parts of Somali-inhabited areas were placed under British military administration for the duration of the war.

This agreement was deeply resented by many Ethiopians. Although Ethiopia was formally independent, it was effectively under British influence. Haile Selassie worked patiently to reduce this dependence and regain full sovereignty.

6.1.3 Reducing External Influence

Haile Selassie pursued several strategies to reduce foreign influence:

  1. Post-war agreements: After WWII, Ethiopia negotiated new agreements that replaced the \(1942\) Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement. British military missions were gradually withdrawn, and Ethiopia regained control over its foreign policy and defense.
  2. Diversifying international relations: Haile Selassie cultivated relationships with multiple countries — the US, Scandinavian countries, and others — to avoid dependence on any single power.
  3. Joining international organizations: Ethiopia joined the United Nations in \(1945\) as a founding member, gaining international legitimacy and a platform for defending its interests. Ethiopia also sent troops to fight in the Korean War (\(1950\)–\(53\)) as part of the UN forces, which earned goodwill from the US and the international community.

6.1.4 Growing American Influence

As British influence declined, American influence increased. The US saw Ethiopia as a strategically important ally in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea region. The US provided economic aid, military assistance, and technical cooperation. This relationship would deepen during the Cold War, as the US sought to counter Soviet influence in Africa.

Key Exam Notes — Restoration and External Influences:
• Haile Selassie restored to power May \(5\), \(1941\) with British help
• Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement (\(1942\)): Britain gained significant influence over Ethiopian affairs
• Haile Selassie gradually reduced British influence through new post-war agreements
• Ethiopia joined UN (\(1945\)); sent troops to Korea; diversified international ties
• As British influence declined, American influence grew (Cold War context)
Practice Question 1: Why was the Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement of \(1942\) significant, and how did Haile Selassie eventually reduce British influence?
Answer:
Significance: The \(1942\) agreement gave Britain significant control over Ethiopia’s foreign affairs, defense, and economic infrastructure (railway, telegraph). Although Ethiopia was formally independent, the agreement made it practically dependent on Britain — a humiliating situation for a country that had just been liberated from Italian occupation.

How Haile Selassie reduced British influence:
1. Post-war renegotiation: After WWII, Ethiopia negotiated new agreements that removed British control over foreign affairs and defense, and ended British administration of contested territories.
2. Diversifying partnerships: Haile Selassie built relationships with the US, Scandinavian countries, and others to avoid dependence on Britain.
3. International legitimacy: Ethiopia joined the UN (\(1945\)) and sent troops to Korea (\(1950\)–\(53\)), earning international respect and American goodwill.
4. Patience and diplomacy: Haile Selassie avoided direct confrontation with Britain, instead using patient diplomacy to gradually restore full Ethiopian sovereignty.

6.2 Socio-economic Conditions and Social Organizations

6.2.1 Economic Conditions After Restoration

Ethiopia’s economy after \(1941\) was extremely underdeveloped. The Italian occupation had disrupted traditional economic systems but had also left behind some infrastructure (roads, buildings, small industries). The fundamental economic structure remained agrarian, with the vast majority of the population engaged in subsistence farming.

Key features of the post-restoration economy:

  • Agricultural dominance: Over \(90\%\) of the population depended on agriculture, mostly at subsistence level. Agricultural productivity was low due to primitive farming methods, soil erosion, and land fragmentation.
  • Land tenure system: Land ownership was highly unequal. The imperial family, the nobility, and the Church owned vast estates, while many peasants were tenants or landless. The rist system (hereditary land rights) and the gult system (land grants from the emperor) created complex and often exploitative tenancy arrangements.
  • Limited industrialization: There was very little industrial development. Some small-scale manufacturing existed in Addis Ababa and a few other towns, but Ethiopia lacked a significant industrial base.
  • Transport and communications: The Italian occupation had built roads and the Djibouti-Addis Ababa railway, but much of the countryside remained isolated and inaccessible.
  • Foreign trade: Ethiopia primarily exported agricultural products (coffee, hides and skins, oilseeds) and imported manufactured goods, creating an unfavorable trade balance.

6.2.2 Social Conditions

Education: Education was extremely limited. Before \(1941\), modern education had been introduced by Menelik II but remained accessible only to a tiny elite. After restoration, Haile Selassie expanded the education system — new schools were built, including the University College of Addis Ababa (later Haile Selassie I University, \(1950\)). However, by the \(1960\)s, literacy rates were still very low (estimated at under \(10\%\)), and schools were concentrated in urban areas.

Health: Health services were grossly inadequate. There were very few hospitals and clinics, mostly in Addis Ababa. Common diseases — malaria, tuberculosis, smallpox, and others — took a heavy toll. Life expectancy was very low (around \(35\)–\(40\) years).

The Ethiopian Orthodox Church: The Church remained one of the most powerful institutions in Ethiopian society. It owned vast landholdings (about \(20\%\)–\(30\%\) of all land, according to some estimates), collected tithes from farmers, and exercised significant social and political influence. However, the Church was also criticized for being conservative, resistant to modernization, and part of the exploitative land tenure system.

6.2.3 Social Organizations

Ethiopian society had various forms of social organization:

  • The imperial court and nobility: The emperor, his family, and the aristocracy formed the political and social elite, controlling land, wealth, and political power.
  • The Church hierarchy: The Orthodox Church hierarchy (bishops, priests, monks) exercised significant social and economic influence, especially in rural areas.
  • The neftegna class: Northern settlers in the south (established during Menelik’s expansion) who served as administrators, soldiers, and landlords.
  • The balabbat: Free-born southern farmers who had lost land to neftegna and became tenants or laborers.
  • Educated elites: A small but growing group of university-educated Ethiopians who began to question the imperial system and advocate for reform or change.
  • Labor movements: Urban workers began to form trade unions and associations to demand better wages and working conditions.
  • Student movements: University students became increasingly politicized and active, advocating for land reform, democracy, and social justice.
Key Exam Notes — Socio-economic Conditions:
• Economy: Overwhelmingly agrarian; subsistence farming; unequal land tenure (rist and gult systems)
• Education: Very limited; literacy under \(10\%\) by \(1960\)s; schools mainly urban
• Health: Grossly inadequate; very low life expectancy
• Church: Powerful landowner (~\(20\%\)–\(30\%\) of land); conservative; part of land problem
• Social organizations ranged from traditional (nobility, Church) to modern (student unions, labor movements)
• Growing gap between the conservative imperial system and the demands of educated elites
Practice Question 2: Explain the role of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church in the socio-economic life of Ethiopia during the imperial period.
Answer: The Ethiopian Orthodox Church was one of the most powerful institutions in imperial Ethiopia:
1. Land ownership: The Church owned an estimated \(20\%\)–\(30\%\) of all land, making it one of the largest landowners in the country. Church lands were worked by tenants who paid tithes (usually one-tenth of their produce) to the Church.
2. Social influence: The Church was deeply embedded in the daily life of Ethiopian Christians — it provided education (traditional church education), performed religious ceremonies (baptism, marriage, funeral), and was a central institution in community life, especially in rural areas.
3. Political influence: The Church supported and legitimized the imperial system. The emperor was seen as God’s anointed ruler, and the Church provided ideological justification for monarchical rule.
4. Economic burden: Church tithes and land rents were an economic burden on peasant farmers, contributing to rural poverty and the exploitative land tenure system.
5. Conservative force: The Church resisted modernization, reform, and change, seeing them as threats to tradition and its own privileged position. This made it part of the problem that reformers and revolutionaries sought to address.

6.3 Consolidation of Autocracy and Oppositions to the Monarchy

6.3.1 Haile Selassie’s Strategy of Consolidation

After restoration, Haile Selassie systematically consolidated his power, transforming Ethiopia from a traditional monarchy into a more centralized autocracy. His methods included:

  1. Centralizing power: He reduced the autonomy of regional nobility and governors, bringing them under tighter central control. Regional rulers who were too powerful were transferred, sidelined, or co-opted.
  2. Controlling the military: Haile Selassie was careful to keep the military under his personal control. He rotated military commanders, prevented any single officer from building a power base, and maintained separate security forces that reported directly to him.
  3. Patronage networks: He distributed offices, land, and privileges to create a network of loyal supporters who depended on him for their positions and wealth.
  4. Constitutional changes: The \(1955\) Revised Constitution formally made Ethiopia a constitutional monarchy with a parliament — but in practice, the emperor retained all real power.
  5. Suppressing opposition: He used the security apparatus (police, military intelligence) to monitor, intimidate, and arrest political opponents, students, and labor activists.

6.3.2 The 1955 Revised Constitution

In \(1955\), Haile Selassie promulgated a Revised Constitution that was presented as a modernizing reform. It established a bicameral parliament (Chamber of Deputies and Senate) and guaranteed some civil rights.

However, the constitution was largely cosmetic:

  • The emperor retained the power to appoint and dismiss ministers, dissolve parliament, and rule by decree.
  • Parliament had very limited powers and served mainly as an advisory body.
  • The constitution did not create genuine democratic governance — it formalized the emperor’s autocratic power in a modern legal framework.

6.3.3 The Eritrean Question

The status of Eritrea was one of the most important and contentious issues during this period. After WWII, Eritrea was administered by Britain under a UN mandate. In \(1952\), the UN General Assembly passed a resolution federating Eritrea with Ethiopia under the Ethiopian crown.

The federation (\(1952\)–\(1962\)): Eritrea was supposed to have its own government, parliament, and laws on internal matters, while Ethiopia handled foreign affairs, defense, and currency. However, Haile Selassie gradually undermined Eritrean autonomy — imposing Amharic as the official language, dissolving the Eritrean parliament, and replacing Eritrean institutions with imperial ones.

In \(1962\), the federation was unilaterally dissolved, and Eritrea was annexed as a province of Ethiopia. This was a critical mistake that led to the Eritrean liberation struggle, which would consume Ethiopian resources and contribute to the eventual downfall of the imperial regime and later the Derg.

6.3.4 Sources of Opposition

By the \(1960\)s, opposition to Haile Selassie’s rule was growing from multiple sources:

  • Student movements: University students at Haile Selassie I University became increasingly radicalized, demanding land reform, democratic governance, and social justice. The University Students’ Union of Addis Ababa (USUAA) became a major center of opposition.
  • Labor movements: Urban workers formed trade unions and went on strikes demanding better wages and conditions. The government responded with repression.
  • Eritrean nationalists: The Eritrean Liberation Front (ELF), formed in \(1960\), began an armed struggle for Eritrean independence.
  • Peasant discontent: Rural poverty, landlessness, and exploitation fueled simmering resentment in the countryside.
  • Ethiopian elites: Even some educated Ethiopians within the system began to criticize the government’s corruption, inefficiency, and resistance to reform.
  • Regional rebellions: In addition to Eritrea, other regions (Bale, Ogaden, Gojjam) experienced rebellions against imperial rule.
Key Exam Notes — Consolidation and Opposition:
• Haile Selassie consolidated autocracy through centralization, patronage, military control, constitutional window-dressing
• \(1955\) Constitution: Looked modern but kept all real power with the emperor
• Eritrean federation (\(1952\)): Autonomy gradually undermined; annexed (\(1962\)) → triggered liberation struggle
• Opposition grew from students, workers, Eritrean nationalists, peasants, regional rebellions
• Government responded primarily with repression rather than reform — a fatal mistake
See also  Africa and the Colonial Experience (1880s – 1960s): Detailed Notes & Exam Questions | Grade 12 History Unit 2
Practice Question 3: Why was the dissolution of the Eritrean federation in \(1962\) significant? Discuss its consequences.
Answer:
Why it was significant: The federation (\(1952\)–\(1962\)) was supposed to respect Eritrean autonomy within a union with Ethiopia. By dissolving the federation and annexing Eritrea as a province, Haile Selassie violated the UN resolution that had established the federation, alienated Eritreans, and transformed the political question from autonomy within Ethiopia to complete independence from Ethiopia.

Consequences:
1. Eritrean armed struggle: The annexation was the direct trigger for the Eritrean liberation war, led first by the ELF and later by the EPLF (Eritrean People’s Liberation Front). This war would last for \(30\) years and consume enormous Ethiopian resources.
2. Militarization: The Eritrean war forced Ethiopia to maintain a large and expensive military, draining resources that could have been used for development.
3. Social and human cost: The war caused massive suffering — displacement, casualties, and destruction in Eritrea and Tigray.
4. Contributed to imperial downfall: The war exposed the weakness of the imperial regime’s military and governance, contributing to the conditions that led to the \(1974\) revolution.
5. Contributed to Derg downfall: The war continued under the Derg and was a major factor in the Derg’s eventual defeat by the EPRDF in \(1991\).
6. Lasting impact: The Eritrean question remains unresolved — the war ended with Eritrean independence (\(1993\)), but the Ethiopia-Eritrea relationship has remained troubled.

6.4 The 1974 Revolution: The Downfall of the Emperor and the Rise of the Derg

6.4.1 Causes of the Revolution

The \(1974\) Ethiopian Revolution was one of the most significant events in modern Ethiopian history. It ended the imperial system that had lasted for centuries. The revolution was caused by multiple converging factors:

1. The Wollo Famine (1972–1973): A devastating famine struck the Wollo and Tigray regions, killing an estimated \(100{,}000\) to \(200{,}000\) people. The imperial government initially tried to conceal the famine’s severity and was slow to respond. When news and images of the famine reached Addis Ababa and the international community, the emperor’s reputation was catastrophically damaged. The contrast between the emperor’s wealth and the suffering of his people became a powerful symbol of the regime’s failure.

2. Economic crisis: Ethiopia faced rising unemployment, inflation, and growing inequality. The oil crisis of \(1973\) increased the cost of imports. The economy could not meet the needs of a growing population.

3. Political stagnation: Despite decades of rule, Haile Selassie had not addressed Ethiopia’s fundamental problems — land inequality, poverty, lack of democracy, and the Eritrean war. The regime appeared increasingly out of touch and corrupt.

4. Military discontent: Junior military officers were frustrated by low pay, poor conditions, and the conduct of the Eritrean war. They felt that senior officers and the imperial court were corrupt and incompetent.

5. Student and intellectual opposition: University students and intellectuals had been campaigning for land reform, democracy, and social justice for years. They provided the ideological framework for change.

6.4.2 The Process of the Revolution

The revolution unfolded through several phases in early \(1974\):

TIMELINE OF THE 1974 REVOLUTION ===================================== Feb 1974: Soldiers at Negele Borana mutiny over pay/conditions → Government suppressed but unrest spreadMarch 1974: More military units mutinied → Haile Selassie appointed Endalkachew Mekonnen PM → Attempted reforms too lateJune 1974: The Derg (Coordinating Committee of the Armed Forces) formed by junior military officers → Began arresting senior officialsJuly 1974: Derg forced Haile Selassie to accept a constitutional monarchy → but real power shifted to DergAug 1974: Haile Selassie was deposed and imprisoned → Monarchy abolished; Ethiopia declared a republicSept 1974: PM Endalkachew and others executed by Derg → Aman Andom (Derg chairman) was also killed → Mengistu Haile Mariam emerged as dominant figureNov 1974: Mengistu defeated rivals within Derg → Became undisputed leader → Began implementing radical Marxist-Leninist policies =====================================

The Derg (which means “committee” in Ge’ez) — officially the Provisional Military Administrative Council (PMAC) — was originally a committee of military officers who coordinated the revolution. It was NOT a popular democratic movement — it was a military takeover that seized power from the emperor but then faced its own internal power struggles.

6.4.3 From Revolution to Military Dictatorship

The revolution’s initial promises of democracy and reform were quickly abandoned. Under Mengistu Haile Mariam, who emerged as the Derg’s leader after defeating internal rivals (sometimes through violent purges), Ethiopia became a Military-Marxist-Leninist dictatorship.

The Derg declared Ethiopia a socialist state, aligned with the Soviet Union, and established a one-party system under the Commission to Organize the Party of the Working People of Ethiopia (COPWE), later replaced by the Workers’ Party of Ethiopia (WPE).

Key Exam Notes — The 1974 Revolution:
• Causes: Wollo famine (\(1972\)–\(73\)), economic crisis, political stagnation, military discontent, student opposition
• Trigger: Military mutinies in early \(1974\)
• Derg: Military committee that seized power; NOT a democratic revolution
• Key figures: Mengistu Haile Mariam (emerged as leader), Aman Andom, Endalkachew Mekonnen
• Process: Gradual shift from reform to overthrow (Feb–Sept \(1974\))
• Outcome: Monarchy abolished; Ethiopia declared socialist republic under military dictatorship
Practice Question 4: “The Wollo famine was the decisive factor in the downfall of Haile Selassie.” Discuss this statement with supporting evidence.
Answer: The Wollo famine (\(1972\)–\(1973\)) was indeed the decisive factor that turned existing discontent into a revolutionary crisis, though other factors had been building for years.

Why the famine was decisive:
1. Moral shock: Images of starving people in Wollo, while the imperial court lived in luxury, created a moral outrage that transcended all previous criticism. The famine made the regime’s failures visible and undeniable.
2. Loss of legitimacy: The emperor had presented himself as a fatherly protector of the Ethiopian people. The famine destroyed this image — how could a “father” let his children starve?
3. Exposure of government incompetence: The government’s attempt to conceal the famine, its slow response, and its failure to prevent or mitigate the disaster exposed deep institutional failures.
4. Military catalyst: The famine affected military units sent to the region, who saw the suffering firsthand. This contributed directly to military discontent and mutinies in \(1974\).
5. International embarrassment: International media coverage damaged Ethiopia’s reputation and Haile Selassie’s prestige abroad, weakening his ability to secure foreign support.

However, other factors were also important: The famine alone would not have caused revolution without the pre-existing economic crisis, political stagnation, student opposition, and military discontent. The famine was the spark that ignited a fire that had been building for years.

6.5 Socio-economic and Political Reforms of the Military Regime

6.5.1 Land Reform (1975)

The most significant reform of the Derg period was the Land Reform Proclamation of \(1975\). This was a radical transformation of Ethiopia’s land tenure system.

What the reform did:

  • All rural land was declared “the collective property of the Ethiopian people.”
  • Private land ownership was abolished — no individual could own more than \(10\) hectares.
  • Land was redistributed to peasants who had previously been landless or tenants.
  • The large estates of the nobility, Church, and imperial family were confiscated.
  • Farmers were required to join producers’ cooperatives and later collective farms (similar to the Soviet model).

Positive impacts:

  • Millions of previously landless peasants received land for the first time.
  • The feudal land tenure system (rist and gult) was abolished.
  • The reform was initially very popular among the peasantry.

Negative impacts:

  • Forced collectivization was resented by farmers who wanted to farm their own land individually.
  • Agricultural productivity declined because farmers lacked incentive under the collective system.
  • The reform was implemented hastily and administratively chaotic.
  • Experienced farmers lost land due to the \(10\)-hectare limit, reducing productivity.

6.5.2 Literacy Campaign

The Derg launched an ambitious national literacy campaign, mobilizing students and educated youth to teach reading and writing in rural areas. This campaign — called Zemecha (development through cooperation) — significantly increased literacy rates in the short term. However, the campaign was also used for political indoctrination and was disrupted by the ongoing wars.

6.5.3 Political Reforms

The Derg established a one-party socialist state:

  • All political parties except the ruling party were banned.
  • The Workers’ Party of Ethiopia (WPE) was created in \(1984\) as the sole legal party.
  • All organizations — trade unions, student groups, women’s organizations, youth groups — were brought under state control.
  • Mass organizations like the All-Ethiopia Trade Union, Revolutionary Ethiopian Women’s Association, and Ethiopian Youth League were used to mobilize support and monitor the population.

6.5.4 Economic Policies

The Derg followed a Marxist-Leninist economic model:

  • Large-scale nationalization of industries, banks, insurance companies, and commercial enterprises.
  • State planning replaced market mechanisms — five-year plans were introduced.
  • Priority was given to heavy industry and military production rather than consumer goods.
  • Agricultural collectivization was progressively extended.

Problems: The socialist economic policies were largely unsuccessful. Nationalized enterprises were inefficient, shortages of consumer goods became chronic, and agricultural production declined. By the \(1980\)s, Ethiopia faced a severe economic crisis.

6.5.5 Political Repression

The Derg regime was one of the most repressive in Ethiopian history:

  • The Red Terror (\(1977\)–\(1978\)): A campaign of mass political repression directed against suspected opponents of the Derg, especially supporters of the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Party (EPRP). Thousands — possibly tens of thousands — of people were killed, imprisoned, or disappeared. The Red Terror was one of the darkest chapters of Ethiopian history.
  • Political prisoners were held without trial for years.
  • Torture was systematic in detention centers.
  • Any form of political opposition was brutally suppressed.
Key Exam Notes — Derg Reforms:
• Land Reform (\(1975\)): Abolished private land ownership; redistributed to peasants; later forced collectivization
• Literacy Campaign (Zemecha): Mobilized students to teach rural populations; initially successful
• One-party state: WPE (\(1984\)); all opposition banned; mass organizations under state control
• Socialist economy: Nationalization; state planning; five-year plans; collectivization — largely failed
• Red Terror (\(1977\)–\(78\)): Mass killings of suspected opponents; thousands died — darkest chapter of Derg rule
Practice Question 5: Discuss the positive and negative consequences of the Derg’s land reform of \(1975\).
Answer:
Positive consequences:
1. Land redistribution: Millions of landless peasants and tenants received land for the first time, addressing a fundamental injustice that had existed for centuries.
2. Abolition of feudal tenures: The rist and gult systems — which had created exploitative relationships between landlords and tenants — were abolished.
3. Initial popularity: The reform was initially very popular among the peasantry, giving the Derg regime significant rural support in its early years.
4. Social transformation: The reform fundamentally changed the social structure of rural Ethiopia, reducing the power of the aristocracy and the Church.

Negative consequences:
1. Forced collectivization: The requirement that farmers join cooperatives and collective farms was deeply resented. Farmers wanted to own their own land individually, not work collectively.
2. Declining productivity: Collectivization removed individual incentives. Farmers who could not benefit directly from their extra effort had little motivation to work hard. Agricultural productivity declined, contributing to food shortages.
3. Experienced farmers lost: The \(10\)-hectare limit meant that some experienced and productive farmers lost land, reducing overall agricultural output.
4. Bureaucratic interference: State-appointed managers of collective farms were often incompetent and corrupt, making poor decisions about planting, harvesting, and distribution.
5. Long-term damage: The failure of collectivization contributed to the famines of the \(1980\)s, which further undermined the Derg’s legitimacy.
See also  Global and Regional Developments Since 1945 : Detailed Notes & Exam Questions | Grade 12 History Unit 5

6.6 The Decline and Downfall of the Derg Regime: Internal and External Threats

6.6.1 Internal Threats

The Derg faced multiple internal challenges:

1. Armed insurgencies: The Derg faced armed rebellions in several regions:

  • Eritrea: The EPLF (Eritrean People’s Liberation Front) waged a protracted war for independence that drained Ethiopian military resources.
  • Tigray: The Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), formed in \(1975\), waged a guerrilla war against the Derg. The TPLF would eventually become the dominant force in the coalition that overthrew the Derg.
  • Other regions: Insurgencies also operated in Oromia (OLF — Oromo Liberation Front), Somalia/Ogaden (WSLF), and other areas.

2. The 1984–1985 Famine: A devastating famine — caused by drought, civil war, and failed agricultural policies — struck northern Ethiopia (particularly Eritrea and Tigray). An estimated \(1\) million people died. The famine was one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the 20th century and severely damaged the Derg’s legitimacy.

3. Economic crisis: The socialist economic model failed to deliver. By the late \(1980\)s, Ethiopia faced shortages of basic goods, declining agricultural production, massive foreign debt, and inflation. The economy was collapsing.

4. Political disillusionment: Even those who had initially supported the revolution became disillusioned by the Red Terror, forced collectivization, and the regime’s failure to deliver on its promises of prosperity and justice.

6.6.2 External Threats and Relations

Soviet support: The Derg was closely aligned with the USSR, which provided military equipment, economic aid, and political support. However, by the late \(1980\)s, the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev was pursuing reform (Glasnost and Perestroika) and was no longer willing to support repressive allies unconditionally. Soviet aid to Ethiopia declined significantly.

The Ogaden War (\(1977\)–\(1978\)): In \(1977\), Somalia (under Siad Barre) invaded the Ethiopian Ogaden region, seeking to exploit Ethiopia’s post-revolutionary chaos. The Derg responded with massive military mobilization, and with Soviet and Cuban military support, defeated the Somali forces by early \(1978\). While Ethiopia won the war, it was enormously costly and diverted resources from other pressing needs.

Changing international environment: The end of the Cold War reduced the Derg’s options. Without Soviet support, the regime could not sustain its military campaigns against multiple insurgencies.

6.6.3 The Fall of the Derg (1991)

The final blow came from the EPRDF (Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front), a coalition led by the TPLF that also included the EPLF and other groups.

The EPRDF launched a series of military offensives in \(1989\)–\(1991\):

  • In \(1989\), the EPRDF captured large parts of Tigray.
  • In \(1990\)–\(91\), it advanced southward, winning battle after battle against demoralized and overstretched Derg forces.
  • In May \(1991\), EPRDF forces entered Addis Ababa.

Mengistu Haile Mariam fled to Zimbabwe on May \(21\), \(1991\). The Derg regime collapsed without a final battle in the capital.

The Derg’s downfall was followed by:

  • The EPLF established the independent state of Eritrea (\(1993\)).
  • The EPRDF, led by Meles Zenawi, established a transitional government and later the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (\(1995\)).
Key Exam Notes — Derg Downfall:
• Internal threats: EPLF (Eritrea), TPLF (Tigray), OLF (Oromia), other insurgencies
• Famine (\(1984\)–\(85\)): ~\(1\) million died; devastated Derg legitimacy
• Economic collapse: Socialist policies failed; shortages, debt, inflation
• External changes: Soviet support declined (Gorbachev reforms); Cold War ending
• Ogaden War (\(1977\)–\(78\)): Won with Soviet/Cuban help but was enormously costly
• Fall (May \(1991\)): EPRDF entered Addis Ababa; Mengistu fled to Zimbabwe
• Aftermath: Eritrea independent (\(1993\)); EPRDF/Meles Zenawi took power in Ethiopia
Practice Question 6: Explain why the Derg regime collapsed in \(1991\). Discuss at least four factors.
Answer:
1. Armed insurgencies: The Derg faced multiple well-organized armed rebellions — the EPLF in Eritrea, the TPLF in Tigray, the OLF in Oromia, and others. These insurgencies tied down the military, drained resources, and controlled increasing territory. The EPRDF coalition ultimately proved militarily superior.
2. The \(1984\)–\(1985\) famine: The devastating famine in northern Ethiopia — caused by drought, war, and failed agricultural policies — killed approximately \(1\) million people. It exposed the Derg’s failure to provide for its citizens and destroyed whatever legitimacy the regime still had.
3. Economic collapse: Socialist economic policies (nationalization, collectivization, state planning) failed catastrophically. By the late \(1980\)s, there were severe shortages of basic goods, massive foreign debt, declining agricultural production, and hyperinflation. The economy could not sustain the military campaigns or provide for the population.
4. Loss of Soviet support: The end of the Cold War and Gorbachev’s reforms meant the USSR was no longer willing or able to provide the military and economic aid that the Derg depended on. Without Soviet support, the Derg could not maintain its military machine.
5. Political isolation: The Red Terror and political repression had alienated virtually every segment of society — students, intellectuals, workers, religious communities, and even many within the military. By \(1991\), the Derg had no social base of support.
6. EPRDF military superiority: The EPRDF coalition was well-organized, motivated, and strategically effective. It exploited the Derg’s overextension and demoralization, winning a series of military victories in \(1989\)–\(1991\).
Practice Question 7: “The Derg regime was its own worst enemy.” Discuss this statement with reference to its domestic policies.
Answer: This statement means that the Derg’s own policies — rather than external threats — were primarily responsible for its downfall.

1. The Red Terror: Instead of building broad political support after the revolution, the Derg murdered thousands of suspected opponents (\(1977\)–\(78\)). This alienated the educated elite, students, and workers who could have been sources of constructive support. It also created a culture of fear that suppressed honest feedback — meaning the leadership never heard bad news until it was too late.
2. Forced collectivization: The land reform initially gave peasants land (earning popularity), but forced collectivization afterward destroyed the incentive to produce. This caused agricultural decline, food shortages, and eventually famine — undermining the regime’s legitimacy in the very rural areas where it had been strongest.
3. Economic mismanagement: Nationalization of industries without experienced managers, state planning without reliable data, and prioritization of military spending over civilian needs created economic chaos. The economy that the Derg inherited was weak but functional; the Derg made it non-functional.
4. Military overextension: The Ogaden War (\(1977\)–\(78\)) was won but at enormous cost. Fighting multiple insurgencies simultaneously (Eritrea, Tigray, Oromia, Somalia) overstretched the military and drained resources.
5. Failure to reform: When it became clear by the mid-\(1980\)s that socialist policies were failing, the Derg was too rigid to adapt. Half-hearted reform attempts (like the mixed economy adjustments of \(1990\)) came too late and were not credible.

Conclusion: While external factors (Soviet withdrawal, EPRDF military capability) contributed to the Derg’s fall, the regime primarily destroyed itself through its own repressive and misguided policies.

Revision Notes — Exam Focus

1. Timeline Overview

\(1941\): Haile Selassie restored (May \(5\)) with British help
\(1942\): Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement — British influence
\(1945\): Ethiopia joins UN as founding member
\(1950\): Haile Selassie I University established
\(1952\): Eritrea federated with Ethiopia (UN resolution)
\(1955\): Revised Constitution — looked modern but emperor kept power
\(1962\): Eritrean federation dissolved; Eritrea annexed as province
\(1960\)/\(1961\): Eritrean armed struggle begins (ELF)
\(1972\)–\(73\): Wollo famine — ~\(100{,}000\)–\(200{,}000\) deaths
\(1974\): Revolution — Derg overthrows Haile Selassie (Sept)
\(1975\): Land Reform Proclamation
\(1977\)–\(78\): Red Terror + Ogaden War
\(1984\)–\(85\): Devastating famine — ~\(1\) million deaths
\(1989\)–\(91\): EPRDF military offensive
May \(1991\): Derg collapses; Mengistu flees; EPRDF takes power
\(1993\): Eritrea becomes independent

2. Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement vs. Later Period

\(1942\) Agreement: British control over foreign affairs, defense, railway, telegraph; British military administration of Ogaden
Post-war: New agreements reduced British influence; British missions withdrawn
Shift: US replaced Britain as primary external partner (Cold War context)
Key lesson: Haile Selassie used patient diplomacy to regain full sovereignty

3. Socio-economic Conditions (Pre-1974)

• Economy: ~\(90\%\) agrarian; subsistence farming; unequal land tenure
• Land systems: Rist (hereditary rights) + Gult (imperial land grants) = exploitative
• Church: Owned ~\(20\%\)–\(30\%\) of land; collected tithes; conservative force
• Education: Literacy under \(10\%\); schools mainly urban; Haile Selassie I University (\(1950\))
• Health: Very few hospitals; low life expectancy (~\(35\)–\(40\) years)
• Gap: Conservative imperial system vs. demands of educated urban elites

4. The 1974 Revolution

Causes: Wollo famine, economic crisis, political stagnation, military discontent, student opposition
Process: Military mutinies (Feb) → Derg formed (June) → Emperor deposed (Sept) → Mengistu emerged (Nov)
Derg: Originally reform committee; became military-Marxist-Leninist dictatorship under Mengistu
NOT democratic: A military coup that replaced one authoritarian system with another

5. Derg Reforms

Land Reform (\(1975\)): Abolished private ownership; redistributed to peasants; later forced collectivization
Literacy (Zemecha): Students sent to rural areas; initially increased literacy
One-party state: WPE (\(1984\)); all opposition banned
Socialist economy: Nationalization; state planning; collectivization — FAILED
Red Terror (\(1977\)–\(78\)): Mass killings of suspected opponents (EPRP supporters); thousands died

6. Derg Downfall

Internal: Multiple insurgencies (EPLF, TPLF, OLF); \(1984\)–\(85\) famine (~\(1\) million dead); economic collapse; political alienation
External: Soviet support declined (Gorbachev); Cold War ending; Ogaden War cost
Fall: EPRDF offensive (\(1989\)–\(91\)); Addis Ababa captured (May \(1991\)); Mengistu fled to Zimbabwe
Aftermath: Eritrea independent (\(1993\)); EPRDF/Meles Zenawi established new government

7. Important Definitions

TermDefinition
ArbegnochPatriots who conducted guerrilla resistance against Italian occupation (1936–41)
Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement\(1942\) treaty giving Britain significant influence over Ethiopian affairs
RistTraditional Ethiopian land tenure system based on hereditary use rights
GultLand grant system where the emperor granted land in exchange for service/taxes
NeftegnaNorthern settlers in the south who served as administrators and landlords
DergProvisional Military Administrative Council — the military committee that seized power in 1974
Red TerrorDerg’s campaign of mass killings against suspected political opponents (1977–78)
ZemechaDerg’s literacy campaign — “development through cooperation”
EPLFEritrean People’s Liberation Front — fought for Eritrean independence
TPLFTigray People’s Liberation Front — led the coalition that overthrew the Derg
EPRDFEthiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front — coalition led by TPLF that took power in 1991
WPEWorkers’ Party of Ethiopia — the Derg’s sole legal political party (1984)

8. Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Saying “the \(1944\) agreement” — the Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement was signed in \(1942\).
2. Confusing the \(1952\) Eritrean federation with the \(1962\) annexation — different events with different significance.
3. Saying “the Derg was a democratic government” — it was a military dictatorship.
4. Confusing the Wollo famine (\(1972\)–\(73\)) with the \(1984\)–\(85\) famine — different famines, different contexts.
5. Saying “the land reform was entirely successful” — it had both positive and very negative consequences.
6. Confusing the EPLF (Eritrea) with the TPLF (Tigray) — different organizations with different goals.
7. Saying “Mengistu was overthrown by popular uprising” — he was overthrown by the EPRDF military offensive.
8. Confusing the Red Terror with the White Terror — in Ethiopia, the Red Terror was the Derg’s repression; there was no equivalent “White Terror.”
9. Saying “Eritrea became independent in 1991” — the Derg fell in \(1991\); Eritrea formally became independent in \(1993\) after a referendum.

Challenge Exam Questions

Multiple Choice Questions

Question 1: The Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement of \(1942\) was significant because:

A) It granted Ethiopia full independence from all foreign influence
B) It gave Britain significant control over Ethiopian foreign affairs, defense, and infrastructure
C) It made Ethiopia a British colony
D) It transferred Eritrea to British permanent control
Answer: B) It gave Britain significant control over Ethiopian foreign affairs, defense, and infrastructure. The \(1942\) agreement required Ethiopia to follow British advice on foreign affairs and defense, allowed a British military mission, and gave Britain control over the railway and telegraph. Ethiopia was NOT made a colony (option C), nor did it gain full independence (option A). Eritrea was placed under temporary British military administration, not permanent control (option D).

Question 2: The dissolved Eritrean federation and annexation of Eritrea took place in:

A) 1952
B) 1955
C) 1962
D) 1974

Question 3: The Red Terror in Ethiopia was carried out by:

A) Haile Selassie’s imperial government
B) The EPLF against Ethiopian civilians in Eritrea
C) The Derg against suspected political opponents, especially EPRP supporters
D) The TPLF against Derg officials in Tigray
Answer: C) The Derg against suspected political opponents, especially EPRP supporters. The Red Terror (\(1977\)–\(1978\)) was a campaign of mass political repression by the Derg regime, directed primarily against supporters of the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Party (EPRP), which opposed the Derg from a Marxist perspective. It was NOT carried out by Haile Selassie (option A), the EPLF (option B), or the TPLF (option D).

Question 4: Mengistu Haile Mariam fled Ethiopia in:

A) 1989
B) 1990
C) 1991
D) 1993
Answer: C) 1991. Mengistu fled to Zimbabwe on May \(21\), \(1991\), as EPRDF forces approached Addis Ababa. \(1989\) was when the EPRDF launched its offensive. \(1990\) saw continued EPRDF advances. \(1993\) was when Eritrea formally became independent — a different event in a different year.

Question 5: Which of the following was NOT a cause of the \(1974\) revolution?

A) The Wollo famine of 1972–73
B) The Eritrean war of independence
C) The success of the land reform program
D) Military discontent over pay and conditions
Answer: C) The success of the land reform program. The land reform was a CONSEQUENCE of the revolution (\(1975\)), not a cause of it. The revolution happened in \(1974\); the land reform came afterward. The Wollo famine (A), the Eritrean war (B), and military discontent (D) were all pre-existing problems that contributed to the revolution. This question tests whether you understand the chronological order of events.

Fill in the Blank Questions

Question 6: Emperor Haile Selassie entered Addis Ababa on May __________, \(1941\), ending five years of Italian occupation.

Answer: 5. May \(5\), \(1941\) is celebrated as a national holiday (Patriots’ Victory Day) because it marks the restoration of Ethiopian sovereignty after Italian occupation (\(1936\)–\(1941\)). It symbolizes not just the emperor’s return but the nation’s liberation.

Question 7: The Derg’s literacy campaign, which mobilized students to teach in rural areas, was called __________.

Answer: Zemecha (meaning “development through cooperation”). This campaign was part of the Derg’s broader effort to transform Ethiopian society. It did increase literacy rates initially, but was also used for political indoctrination and was disrupted by the ongoing wars and famine.

Question 8: The devastating famine of \(1984\)–\(1985\) that killed approximately __________ million people in northern Ethiopia was caused by drought, civil war, and failed __________ policies.

Answer: 1; agricultural (or collectivization). The \(1984\)–\(1985\) famine was one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the 20th century. While drought was a contributing factor, the famine was made much worse by the civil war (which disrupted agriculture and prevented food distribution) and the Derg’s failed agricultural policies (especially forced collectivization, which reduced food production).

Question 9: The military coalition led by the TPLF that overthrew the Derg in \(1991\) was called the __________.

Answer: EPRDF (Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front). The EPRDF was a coalition that included the TPLF (Tigray), EPLF (Eritrea), and other groups. After victory, the EPLF established independent Eritrea (\(1993\)), while the TPLF-dominated EPRDF established the transitional government of Ethiopia.

Question 10: Under the traditional Ethiopian land tenure system, the Church owned approximately __________ percent of all land.

Answer: 20 to 30 (estimates vary). The Ethiopian Orthodox Church was one of the largest landowners in the country. Church lands were worked by tenant farmers who paid tithes (one-tenth of their produce). This was a major source of the land inequality that the \(1975\) Land Reform addressed — though the reform’s forced collectivization later created new problems.

Short Answer Questions

Question 11: Compare the external influences on Ethiopia during the immediate post-restoration period (\(1941\)–\(1945\)) and during the Derg period (\(1974\)–\(1991\)). How were the nature and sources of external influence different?

Answer:
Post-restoration (\(1941\)–\(1945\)): British influence
• Source: Britain (a Western capitalist democratic power)
• Nature: Primarily economic and military — the Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement gave Britain control over infrastructure, defense advice, and economic concessions
• Context: WWII; Britain was the dominant regional power; Ethiopia was weak and recovering from occupation
• Haile Selassie’s response: Patiently negotiated to reduce British influence; diversified partnerships (US, Scandinavia, UN)

Derg period (\(1974\)–\(1991\)): Soviet influence
• Source: USSR and Eastern Bloc (communist states)
• Nature: Comprehensive — military equipment, economic aid, political ideology, and development model. The Derg adopted Marxism-Leninism and restructured Ethiopia’s entire political and economic system along Soviet lines.
• Context: Cold War; the Derg chose the Soviet camp; the USSR saw Ethiopia as a strategic ally in the Horn of Africa
• Outcome: When Soviet support declined in the late \(1980\)s, the Derg could not survive

Key difference: British influence was limited to specific areas and was gradually reduced. Soviet influence was total — it affected Ethiopia’s entire political, economic, and social system. When the British left, Ethiopia continued much as before. When the Soviets left, the Derg collapsed.

Question 12: “The \(1955\) Revised Constitution was more about appearance than substance.” Discuss this statement with three arguments.

Answer:
1. Emperor retained all real power: Despite creating a parliament (Chamber of Deputies and Senate), the constitution allowed the emperor to appoint and dismiss ministers, dissolve parliament at will, and rule by decree. Parliament could advise but not effectively check the emperor’s power. It was an advisory body, not a genuine legislature.
2. No genuine democratic participation: Elections were not genuinely competitive. Members of parliament were largely appointed or selected from loyal supporters of the emperor. There was no meaningful opposition allowed in parliament. The constitution created the appearance of representative government without the reality.
3. Civil rights were theoretical: While the constitution guaranteed certain civil rights on paper, in practice, these rights were not respected. Political opponents could be detained, censored, or exiled. The security apparatus operated with little regard for constitutional protections.
4. Designed for international image: The constitution was partly designed to improve Ethiopia’s international image — to show the world that Ethiopia was “modernizing” and “constitutional.” This was important for securing foreign aid and international legitimacy, especially in the context of the UN and post-WWII decolonization.

Conclusion: The \(1955\) constitution was a clever piece of political theater — it modernized the outward forms of government while preserving the essence of autocratic imperial rule.

Question 13: Why was the Ogaden War (\(1977\)–\(1978\)) both a victory and a disaster for the Derg?

Answer:
Why it was a victory:
• Ethiopia defeated Somalia’s invasion and maintained control of the Ogaden region.
• The victory was achieved with Soviet and Cuban military support (weapons, advisers, Cuban troops), demonstrating the value of the Derg’s Cold War alliance with the USSR.
• It boosted the Derg’s domestic legitimacy temporarily — defeating a foreign invader was popular.

Why it was a disaster:
1. Enormous cost: The war consumed resources that Ethiopia could not afford — diverting funds from development, agriculture, and social services.
2. Military overextension: Fighting the Ogaden War while simultaneously conducting counter-insurgencies in Eritrea, Tigray, and other regions overstretched the military and created vulnerabilities.
3. Increased dependence on the USSR: The war made Ethiopia even more dependent on Soviet military aid, reducing its autonomy. When Soviet support declined in the late \(1980\)s), Ethiopia had no alternative.
4. Distracted from internal reform: The war diverted attention from the urgent need to address economic problems, the famine, and governance failures that were building toward crisis.
5. Contributed to the famine: Resources diverted to the war effort were not available for famine relief in the north, contributing to the catastrophic \(1984\)–\(1985\) famine.

Lesson: Military victories can be political and economic disasters if they consume resources needed for sustainable development.

Step-by-Step Explanation Questions

Question 14: Trace the evolution of Ethiopian land tenure from the imperial period through the Derg period. For each stage, explain: (a) the system, (b) who benefited, and (c) who suffered.

Answer:

Stage 1: Imperial Period (before 1975)
(a) System: Based on two traditional tenure systems — Rist (hereditary use rights to land within a community) and Gult (land granted by the emperor to nobles, officials, and the Church in exchange for service/taxes). Land was also owned privately by the imperial family and nobility.
(b) Who benefited: The imperial family, the nobility, the Orthodox Church (which owned ~\(20\%\)–\(30\%\) of land), and neftegna (northern settlers in the south who became landlords).
(c) Who suffered: The peasantry — especially southern farmers (balabbat) who became tenants paying rent and tithes to landlords and the Church. Many were landless or had insufficient land.

Stage 2: Early Derg Period (1975 — before collectivization)
(a) System: The \(1975\) Land Reform Proclamation abolished private land ownership. All rural land became “collective property.” Land was redistributed to landless peasants and tenants, with a maximum of \(10\) hectares per family. Farmers could initially farm individually.
(b) Who benefited: Millions of previously landless peasants and tenants received land for the first time. This was genuinely transformative and initially very popular.
(c) Who suffered: Former landlords (nobility, Church, neftegna) who lost their land without compensation. Some experienced farmers who lost land due to the \(10\)-hectare limit.

Stage 3: Late Derg Period (after mid-1970s — collectivization)
(a) System: Farmers were progressively required to join producers’ cooperatives and then collective farms (similar to the Soviet kolkhoz model). Individual farming was eliminated. Land, tools, and animals were collectively owned; work was organized collectively; distribution was based on work points.
(b) Who benefited: State officials and collective farm managers who gained control over resources. The state argued that collectivization would benefit all through modernization — but this was theoretical.
(c) Who suffered: Virtually all farmers — who lost the individual land they had just received, lost the incentive to produce more, and were forced into an inefficient system that produced less food. The entire Ethiopian population suffered from the resulting food shortages and famine.

Summary: Imperial system → exploitative but functional. Early Derg reform → genuinely popular but incomplete. Late Derg collectivization → disastrous failure that contributed to regime collapse.

Question 15: “Both Haile Selassie and the Derg were overthrown because they failed to address Ethiopia’s fundamental problems.” Compare and contrast the failures of each regime that led to their downfall.

Answer:

Similarities in their failures:
Both regimes failed to address: (a) the land question in a sustainable way, (b) the demand for meaningful political participation, (c) the challenge of national unity (Eritrean and regional questions), (d) economic underdevelopment, and (e) the growing gap between rulers and ruled. Both relied on repression rather than reform when faced with opposition. Both lost legitimacy because they failed to deliver on their promises.

Differences in their failures:
1. Nature of failure: Haile Selassie failed because he was too conservative — he resisted necessary reforms until it was too late. The Derg failed because it was too radical — it imposed destructive changes (collectivization, Red Terror) that were worse than the problems they were meant to solve.
2. Pace of failure: Haile Selassie’s failure was gradual — decades of stagnation that eroded legitimacy slowly. The Derg’s failure was rapid — a few years of catastrophic policies (Red Terror, collectivization, war) that destroyed legitimacy quickly.
3. Economic vs. political: Haile Selassie’s failure was primarily political — the economic system functioned (for the elite) but governance didn’t evolve. The Derg’s failure was both political AND economic — it destroyed the existing economic system without creating a working replacement.
4. External vs. internal: Haile Selassie fell mainly due to internal dynamics (famine, discontent, military mutiny), though external influences existed. The Derg fell due to the interaction of internal failures AND external changes (end of Cold War, Soviet withdrawal of support).
5. Violence: Haile Selassie’s regime fell with relatively little violence (the emperor was imprisoned, not killed). The Derg’s rule was marked by extreme violence (Red Terror, famine, wars) that destroyed social trust and institutions.

Overall lesson: Whether too conservative or too radical, regimes that fail to address fundamental problems and respond to people’s needs eventually lose legitimacy and fall. The method of failure differs, but the outcome is the same.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top