Back to: Economics – For University level
3.2 The Concept of Utility
In the previous section, we explored consumer preferences—how individuals rank different bundles of goods. But how do economists translate these rankings into something analyzable? The answer lies in the concept of utility.
Utility is defined as the satisfaction or pleasure a consumer derives from consuming a good or service. It is the internal, subjective measure of benefit that motivates consumption decisions. Importantly, utility does not equate to physical usefulness—it reflects personal value, not objective function.
Three Essential Characteristics of Utility
- Subjectivity: Utility varies from person to person. A smoker gains utility from a cigarette; a non-smoker gains none—or even disutility (negative satisfaction).
- Context-Dependence: The same good can yield different utility at different times or places. For example, a cup of coffee provides high utility at 6 a.m. but low (or zero) utility right after lunch.
- Non-Measurability in Absolute Terms: We cannot say “this apple gives me exactly 15 units of happiness.” Instead, we infer utility from choices—e.g., if a consumer chooses an apple over a banana, we infer the apple provides higher utility for them.
Utility vs. Usefulness: A Critical Distinction
Many students mistakenly equate “utility” with “usefulness.” This is incorrect in economic theory. Consider:
- Usefulness: Objective, physical capacity of a good to serve a purpose (e.g., a hammer drives nails).
- Utility: Subjective satisfaction derived by a specific individual (e.g., a child might derive more utility from a hammer as a toy than from its intended use).
Hence, a life-saving medicine has high usefulness—but if a healthy person doesn’t need it, its utility to them is near zero.
How Utility Drives Consumer Choice
Consumers act to maximize total utility given their limited income. This doesn’t mean they seek the “most useful” goods—but the combination that gives the highest overall satisfaction.
For instance, a student with Birr 100 might choose:
- Option A: 5 textbooks (high usefulness, but low immediate utility if too dense to read)
- Option B: 1 textbook + 2 novels + coffee (lower “usefulness,” but higher total utility due to enjoyment and relaxation)
Imagine two people stranded in a desert:
– Person 1 has 10 bottles of water and no food.
– Person 2 has 10 loaves of bread and no water.
For Person 1, an extra loaf of bread has low utility (they’re already hydrated but starving).
For Person 2, that same loaf has high utility.
Utility depends on circumstances—not just the good itself.
Utility in Economic Modeling
Although utility itself is unobservable, economists use two main approaches to model it:
| Approach | Key Idea | Measurement | Status in Modern Economics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Utility | Utility can be measured in absolute numerical units (“utils”). | “This orange gives me 10 utils.” | Largely historical—used for intuition but not rigorous modeling. |
| Ordinal Utility | Utility cannot be measured—but bundles can be ranked. | “I prefer bundle A > B > C.” | Dominant in modern microeconomics (via indifference curves). |
While Section 3.3 will explore these approaches in depth, it’s vital to understand that today’s consumer theory relies on ordinal utility. Why? Because we don’t need to know “how much” utility a person gets—we only need to know their ranking of options, which we observe through actual choices.
Common Misconceptions About Utility
Not true. A luxury watch may yield high utility (status, beauty) but low usefulness.
False. Utility is inherently personal and subjective.
True. We infer preferences (and thus utility rankings) from what people actually choose.
In the next section (3.3), we’ll examine how economists formally model utility using both cardinal and ordinal approaches—and why the latter became the foundation of modern consumer theory.